[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Updated 2.1r4 package list errata.



Previously Vincent Renardias wrote:
> Because I wanted to have my y2k "fixes" to be at least roughly tested by a
> few people before to just put them directly in slink (and it seems to have
> been a good idea since the updated gnats introduces a bad bug)

But that's exactly why we have proposed-updates: so we have a well-known
public place where we can put packages that need to be tested.

Wichert.

-- 
  _________________________________________________________________
 / Generally uninteresting signature - ignore at your convenience  \
| wichert@liacs.nl                    http://www.liacs.nl/~wichert/ |
| 1024D/2FA3BC2D 576E 100B 518D 2F16 36B0  2805 3CB8 9250 2FA3 BC2D |

Attachment: pgpgDAnpodl_w.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: