Re: 2.2.11 boot floppies
Christian Meder <meder@isr.uni-stuttgart.de> writes:
> I was just irritated by the fact that Vincent said '2.1r3 is supposed to be
> compatible with 2.2.x kernels' and the fixed ftape-source for 2.2.x
> compatibility is rejected because 2.2.x compatibility is _not_ enough to
> get the package in a point release. It's confusing, isn't it ?
Yeah, well, the ideas that 2.1r3 officially was going to move to 2.2.x
was only revealed much later than my "rejection" (as if I have that
power) of ftape.
--
.....Adam Di Carlo....adam@onShore.com.....<URL:http://www.onShore.com/>
Reply to: