Re: bootable, rootable, base, and the rest

To: Adam Di Carlo <adam@onshore.com>
Cc: debian-release@lists.debian.org, debian-boot@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: bootable, rootable, base, and the rest
From: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
Date: Thu, 8 Jul 1999 11:44:46 +1000
Message-id: <[🔎] 19990708114446.A10601@gondor.apana.org.au>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] E1122Ep-0002c9-00@burrito>; from Adam Di Carlo on Wed, Jul 07, 1999 at 08:40:30PM -0400
References: <19990704222148.A14877@onshore.com> <19990704225917.A8067@localhost> <oan1x86my2.fsf@burrito.fake> <19990708102739.A10020@gondor.apana.org.au> <[🔎] E1122Ep-0002c9-00@burrito>

On Wed, Jul 07, 1999 at 08:40:30PM -0400, Adam Di Carlo wrote:
> 
> I don't get it.  Why not release a proper 2.0.36-4 or 2.0.36-3.1 even
> to stable just like any other package?
> 
> The way the tecra images are released is basically, "not really
> released at all".

Because I do not want this image to be the officla one.
-- 
Debian GNU/Linux 2.1 is out! ( http://www.debian.org/ )
Email:  Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/
PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: bootable, rootable, base, and the rest
  - From: Adam Di Carlo <adam@onshore.com>

References:
- Re: bootable, rootable, base, and the rest
  - From: Adam Di Carlo <adam@onshore.com>

Prev by Date: Re: bootable, rootable, base, and the rest
Next by Date: Re: bootable, rootable, base, and the rest
Previous by thread: Re: bootable, rootable, base, and the rest
Next by thread: Re: bootable, rootable, base, and the rest
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread