done Re: Conflict between R 4.5 and some (mostly r-bioc 3.20) R packages

To: debian-r@lists.debian.org
Subject: done Re: Conflict between R 4.5 and some (mostly r-bioc 3.20) R packages
From: "Rebecca N. Palmer" <rebecca_palmer@zoho.com>
Date: Sun, 4 May 2025 20:22:47 +0100
Message-id: <[🔎] 5ed04232-22c4-480d-838e-17febdaa8e5b@zoho.com>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] aBZUV-Tv18o_zPJV@an3as.eu>
References: <aBATQGz_ycd27jjc@kumo.plessy.net> <ef8d97ab-8d98-4d81-8312-ab05b143026c@zoho.com> <26640.54011.998074.532527@rob.eddelbuettel.com> <cd7144ec-b08a-41e3-9d8c-7cf59be5609a@zoho.com> <26641.1728.628355.30018@rob.eddelbuettel.com> <5f827faf-a226-416b-ab51-23f2d48793c3@zoho.com> <26641.19115.394992.209425@rob.eddelbuettel.com> <7a0a90cc-48a2-4f9d-9803-725c7d77cb07@zoho.com> <26642.3004.847043.287734@rob.eddelbuettel.com> <[🔎] fd42d0fb-86c5-4a9a-a63f-6d1cca2ec161@zoho.com> <[🔎] aBZUV-Tv18o_zPJV@an3as.eu>

R 4.5 has migrated, and all other R package updates (exceptr-cran-broom.helpers, which can't but that's not a problem, #1102589)should migrate if we simply wait.


Hence, there should be no urgent need to remove 32-bit r-*.

I think that leaves r-cran-fastcluster as our only RC bug; it iscurrently waiting for upstream.

Reply to:

References:
- Re: Conflict between R 4.5 and some (mostly r-bioc 3.20) R packages
  - From: "Rebecca N. Palmer" <rebecca_palmer@zoho.com>
- Re: Conflict between R 4.5 and some (mostly r-bioc 3.20) R packages
  - From: Andreas Tille <andreas@an3as.eu>

Prev by Date: Re: Conflict between R 4.5 and some (mostly r-bioc 3.20) R packages
Next by Date: Re: Another R 4.5.0 and BioConductor 3.21 idea
Previous by thread: Re: Conflict between R 4.5 and some (mostly r-bioc 3.20) R packages
Next by thread: Re: Conflict between R 4.5 and some (mostly r-bioc 3.20) R packages
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread