[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Accidental upload of newer r-bioc-biocstyle to unstable ahead of BioConductor 3.20 transition



Hi Michael

On Sat, 30 Nov 2024 at 21:25, Michael R. Crusoe <crusoe@debian.org> wrote:
> While preparing uploads of the BioConductor 3.20 r-bioc-* packages to the experimental distribution, I accidentally uploaded a newer version of r-bioc-biocstyle (2.34.0+dfsg-1) to unstable.
>
> Shall I fix this by rolling back the change with an upload of a r-bioc-biocstyle source package version "2.34.0+really2.32.1+dfsg-1" to unstable (and corresponding "2.34.0+really2.34.0+dfsg-1" version to experimental)?
>
> Or shall I wait for the bioc-3.20 transition's [0] blockers [1][2] to be fixed and permission for the new r-bioc-* packages to be uploaded to unstable?

I don't think this is worth reverting.  It cannot migrate to testing
as it is, and even if it would, we could just add a block hint.

> Sorry about the mess I made!

No problem!

Regards
Graham


Reply to: