[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Bug#1040001: Role of tibble? (Was: Bug#1040001: Seeking advise how to proceed with the transition / move R stack to testing)



Hi Dirk,

Thanks.

On 09-07-2023 18:41, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
On 9 July 2023 at 17:40, Paul Gevers wrote:
| Did we already discuss that r-cran-ps also seems to be impacted by the
| r-base change of the symbols thingy, as can be seen in r-cran-xopen [1].

Correct me if I am wrong but the "symbols thingy" was not a change in R 4.2.*
to R 4.3.*. It was a change by some packages opting into different behavior.

I don't understand this then. For several packages we're seeing failures in testing even if we only use r-base from unstable and everything else from testing to run the test. They pass with a rebuild r-cran-fnn and/or a rebuild and updated r-cran-ps, and/or r-cran-tibble. (Sorry, in my previous message I think I added r-cran-dplyr by mistake, misremembered).

|   33s  10. ps:::not_null(.Call("psll_connections", p))

Tis would be a bug in r-cran-ps and I think a Breaks may be warranted.

Ok, let's remember this.

Given
that ps always had 'native symbols', maybe testthat changed?

But I think (I would need to check for the autopkgtest fallback) in none of the tests, the version of testthat in testing changed between passing and failing tests. Would testthat embed something during the build of the binaries (from the name, I would assume not)?

| Same for r-cran-fnn, which impacts r-cran-uwof [2].
|
| I think what we should do is add a versioned Breaks in r-base on
| <packages-involved-in:r-graphics-engine>, r-cran-ps, r-cran-tibble,
| r-cran-dplyr, r-cran-fnn. I think that's the right thing to do for

I think it would be best to work out to corresponding package pairings and
apply the Breaks to them. If we can.

Sure, lets add the Breaks to the place where it belongs.

For spacetime and stars I suspect (based on past experience) possible
interaction from the underlying graphics libraries.

Good to hear, didn't check yet, but will shortly (geospatial).

If I am not mistaken all of these were already in the Excuses list before we
made addition of the r-graphics-engine-* tag (which was taken care of for R
4.3.* already, having it may help if another change happens like that).

Sure, I'd hope the r-graphics-engine-* Provides only reduced issue, so I'm currently considering them to be different. But I might be proven wrong easily.

Unfortunately I find
the reports a little hard to read and am hence not very efficient at
pinpointing underlying causes. Above you pointed eg at [2] for uwot, I see no
error in there :-/

Well, that log has two tests. The first second one passes, the first one has:
 51s > library(testthat)
 51s > library(uwot)
 51s Loading required package: Matrix
 53s >
 53s > test_check("uwot")
 53s Error in FNN::get.knn(X, k) : DLL requires the use of native symbols
53s Calls: test_check ... eval -> create_data -> find_nn -> FNN_nn -> <Anonymous>
 53s Execution halted

Obviously, I too want my package r-base in testing and I will help. But I
feel that pinning a large Breaks list on it seems a little inefficient /
unfair if the package was not causing the change. We can do if there is (as
we r-graphics-engine-*) an overwhelming feel "that we must".

I want the Breaks in the right location. If we locate a more logical location than r-base, that's where it should go. At least the packages involved in the r-graphics-engine would do nice, as it's really the change in r-base that broke them (will not be needed anymore after the release of trixie as now we have the Provides): r-cran-cairo, r-cran-magick, r-cran-ragg, r-cran-svglite, r-cran-tikzdevice and r-cran-vdiffr.

Paul

Attachment: OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Reply to: