[[ Keeping only R list in CC ]] Hi Andreas, On Wed, Jun 28, 2023 at 02:03:12PM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote: > (this is just an example bug out of a lot you filed) > > Am Wed, Jun 28, 2023 at 08:11:05AM +0200 schrieb Bas Couwenberg: > > 189s DLL requires the use of native symbols > > I wonder, whether all those bugs against single r-* packages are > sensible. As far as I can see we simply need a transition for > this r-base upgrade. Am I missing something? You are correct. A transition is all we need. However, in case of r-cran-epi simply adding a versioned dep on dplyr should do the trick. (epi is not a failure in excuses for dplyr). I think this particular bug is sensible because without these versioned depends, epi will fail it's tests (for instance while backporting). We can go on closing these BRs on the fly. It would also help you track all the dependencies a bit better. PS: Do you need a hand with this transition? Best, Nilesh
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature