Re: Opinions about removal of 32bit architecture for r-cran-rstan (Was: Bug#1037439: r-cran-rstan/armhf FTBFS with r-cran-bh 1.74)
Am Fri, Jun 23, 2023 at 05:26:15AM +0530 schrieb Nilesh Patra:
> However pruning this off 32-bit archsn would also mean
> removing a huge chunk of other R packages which transitively depend on rstan.
> As far as I checked, not all of them are intensive to run, and it is
> likely useful for people who use 32-bit archs in some way.
... which is IMHO the best argument to apply the existing (thanks
again to Adrian) patch.
Kind regards
Andreas.
--
http://fam-tille.de
Reply to: