Re: Bug#1040498: Should we consider the transition ready (Was: Bug#1040498: transition: r-bioc-biocgenerics)
Hi Graham,
Am Tue, Aug 01, 2023 at 01:06:41PM +0000 schrieb Graham Inggs:
> Hi Andreas
Sorry, I can't do this before August 12. But someone from the team
will probably do so hopefully.
Kind regards
Andreas.
> You should check on the package tracker pages for all the r-bioc-*
> uploads and make sure they are ready to migrate along with
> r-bioc-biocgenerics, e.g. r-bioc-cummerbund [1].
>
> r-bioc-biocversion appears to break the autopkgtest of
> r-cran-biocmanager/1.30.21.1+dfsg-1 in testing.
>
> At least the following packages are failing their own autopkgtests in
> unstable (list not complete):
> r-bioc-cummerbund
> r-bioc-decoupler
> r-bioc-monocle
> r-bioc-scran
> r-bioc-singler
>
> r-bioc-dupradar has regressed from passing to neutral, apparently due
> to the use of 'skip-not-installable'. Please don't use this
> restriction on all the autopkgtests in a package, otherwise there are
> no tests which are not superficial, and regressions can migrate to
> testing.
>
> Regards
> Graham
>
>
> [1] https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/r-bioc-cummerbund
>
>
--
http://fam-tille.de
Reply to: