[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Test suite issues due to new upstream version of r-core in unstable (Was: r-cran-shiny: broken symlink: ...)



On Tue, May 16, 2023 at 07:25:15PM +0530, Nilesh Patra wrote:
> I personally prefer "1" over 2 as it is less noise (and effort).

On second thoughts, I think sending it via testing-proposed-updates
would be a better thing to do, as this case perfectly fits the problem.

It's be same effort in both cases (one upload + filing a bug with release team).

> Let me know what you think.

> > [1] https://ci.debian.net/data/autopkgtest/testing/amd64/r/r-cran-thematic/33619891/log.gz
> > [2] https://ci.debian.net/data/autopkgtest/testing/amd64/r/r-cran-treescape/33619892/log.gz
> > [3] https://ci.debian.net/data/autopkgtest/testing/amd64/r/r-cran-treespace/33619893/log.gz
> > [4] https://tracker.debian.org/news/1429562/accepted-r-base-430-1-source-into-unstable/
> [5] https://wiki.debian.org/TestingProposedUpdates

-- 
Best,
Nilesh

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: