RE: smcfcs fails its (1 imputation per core) tests

[Jonathan Bartlett <jwb67@bath.ac.uk>]

Dear Nilesh

Sorry, I just found this email from you in Outlook's junk folder.

If I am interpreting the output correctly, a new argument error check I added in the new version, that the event indicator in survival data is coded as 0/1, is failing in this check of smcfcs_parallel. If that is the correct interpretation, I see now obvious explanation for it. If the new error check I added is working in the non-parallel tests in smcfcs (see bottom of https://github.com/jwb133/smcfcs/blob/master/tests/testthat/test_errorchecks.R) then it apparently failing on this smcfcs_parallel check means it is something to do with the interaction with parallel cores on Debian I guess?

According to CRAN's check results on Debian (https://cran.r-project.org/web/checks/check_results_smcfcs.html) there are no problems as far as I can see?

Thanks, and best wishes.

Jonathan

-----Original Message-----
From: Nilesh Patra <nilesh@tchncs.de> 
Sent: 26 January 2022 19:47
To: Jonathan Bartlett <jwb67@bath.ac.uk>
Cc: Debian R team <debian-r@lists.debian.org>
Subject: smcfcs fails its (1 imputation per core) tests

[You don't often get email from nilesh@tchncs.de. Learn why this is important at http://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderIdentification.]

CAUTION:  This email came from outside of the University. To keep your account safe, only click on links and open attachments if you know the person who sent the email, or you expected to receive this communication.