Re: r-bioc-dropletutils: what happened here?
Hi Graham,
Am Sat, Nov 27, 2021 at 12:20:33PM +0200 schrieb Graham Inggs:
> I looked at the recent upload of r-bioc-dropletutils and noticed it
> dropped the changelog entry of the previous upload. It looks like
> something went wrong with 'routine-update: New upstream version' [1].
> >From what I can see the previous version was properly uploaded [2] and
> tagged [3]. Did I miss something?
For whatever reason I've found
r-bioc-dropletutils (1.14.1+ds-1) unstable; urgency=medium
* Team upload
* Exclude test-hashing.R on s390x as well
-- Graham Inggs <ginggs@debian.org> Sun, 24 Oct 2021 10:56:07 +0000
as changelog entry and my changes endet up in 1.14.1+ds-2. So I manually
did[4] since I did not see any 1.14.1+ds-1 upload ... which was obviously
the wrong fix.
I fixed now the changelog entries to make some sense in some way. I
have no idea whether we can blame routine-update about this. It is
hard to reproduce.
Thanks for pointing this out anyway
Andreas.
> [1] https://salsa.debian.org/r-pkg-team/r-bioc-dropletutils/-/commit/d1bc580fc9c57df549eea64a807fb5fc330124a7
> [2] https://tracker.debian.org/news/1270068/accepted-r-bioc-dropletutils-1123ds-2-source-into-unstable/
> [3] https://salsa.debian.org/r-pkg-team/r-bioc-dropletutils/-/tags/debian%2F1.12.3+ds-2
[4] https://salsa.debian.org/r-pkg-team/r-bioc-dropletutils/-/commit/32b28328c7edddadeb64481f7ccbc6ef69a6c67c
--
http://fam-tille.de
Reply to: