RE: Is there any chance to make mathjaxr non-mandatory in metap

To: Dirk Eddelbuettel <edd@debian.org>
Cc: "Viechtbauer, Wolfgang (SP)" <wolfgang.viechtbauer@maastrichtuniversity.nl>, Andreas Tille <tille@debian.org>, Michael Dewey <lists@dewey.myzen.co.uk>, "debian-r@lists.debian.org" <debian-r@lists.debian.org>, Duncan Murdoch <murdoch.duncan@gmail.com>, "James Pustejovsky" <jepusto@gmail.com>
Subject: RE: Is there any chance to make mathjaxr non-mandatory in metap
From: Dirk Eddelbuettel <edd@debian.org>
Date: Sun, 28 Feb 2021 08:32:15 -0600
Message-id: <[🔎] 24635.43375.39319.720241@rob.eddelbuettel.com>
In-reply-to: <24597.43424.613080.344743@rob.eddelbuettel.com>
References: <20210127075749.GH4758@an3as.eu> <a0a0fe87-335e-399b-97dd-57ab0c66e04b@dewey.myzen.co.uk> <7056baaf0ba34c96afbd6002c1c8d5c6@UM-MAIL3214.unimaas.nl> <24594.51654.478822.942820@rob.eddelbuettel.com> <d8db6848-cbf0-c156-d31a-85531e20ec1f@dewey.myzen.co.uk> <8f98635b9f65481891ddedf757dc3465@UM-MAIL3214.unimaas.nl> <24596.7580.713894.964728@rob.eddelbuettel.com> <20210129174010.GL28662@an3as.eu> <c9ac7ab1916c453a847e82cab44a96e4@UM-MAIL3214.unimaas.nl> <24597.43424.613080.344743@rob.eddelbuettel.com>

On 30 January 2021 at 12:46, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
| Most excellent. I just update the Debian packaging, sent it back to the NEW
| queue and replied to existing mail thread with one of the ftpmasters about it.
| 
| So at "some point soon" (for generous definitions of "soon") this should be
| in Debian, and then as always "eventually" also in Ubuntu and others.

This just happened:

  Subject: r-cran-mathjaxr_1.2-0-2_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into unstable, unstable

so we now have mathjaxr in Debian.

Dirk

-- 
https://dirk.eddelbuettel.com | @eddelbuettel | edd@debian.org

Reply to:

Prev by Date: Re: Any idea what might be the issue of not migrating r-cran-knitr?
Previous by thread: Re: Any idea what might be the issue of not migrating r-cran-knitr?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread