Bug#1091078: libkf5mailimporter: FTBFS: unsatisfiable build-dependencies: akonadi-contacts-data (= 4:22.12.3-1), akonadi-mime-data (= 4:22.12.3-1), akonadi-contacts-data (= 4:22.12.3-1)
Source: libkf5mailimporter
Version: 4:22.12.3-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lucas@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20241222 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> +------------------------------------------------------------------------------+
> | Install package build dependencies |
> +------------------------------------------------------------------------------+
>
>
> Setup apt archive
> -----------------
>
> Merged Build-Depends: cmake (>= 3.16~), debhelper-compat (= 13), extra-cmake-modules (>= 5.99.0~), libgrantlee5-dev (>= 5.2~), libkf5akonadi-dev (>= 4:22.12.3~), libkf5akonadimime-dev (>= 4:22.12.3~), libkf5archive-dev (>= 5.99.0~), libkf5config-dev (>= 5.99.0~), libkf5coreaddons-dev (>= 5.99.0~), libkf5i18n-dev (>= 5.99.0~), libkf5kio-dev (>= 5.99.0~), libkf5mime-dev (>= 22.12.3~), libkf5pimcommon-dev (>= 4:22.12.3~), pkg-kde-tools (>= 0.12), qtbase5-dev (>= 5.15.2~), xauth, xvfb, build-essential, fakeroot
> Filtered Build-Depends: cmake (>= 3.16~), debhelper-compat (= 13), extra-cmake-modules (>= 5.99.0~), libgrantlee5-dev (>= 5.2~), libkf5akonadi-dev (>= 4:22.12.3~), libkf5akonadimime-dev (>= 4:22.12.3~), libkf5archive-dev (>= 5.99.0~), libkf5config-dev (>= 5.99.0~), libkf5coreaddons-dev (>= 5.99.0~), libkf5i18n-dev (>= 5.99.0~), libkf5kio-dev (>= 5.99.0~), libkf5mime-dev (>= 22.12.3~), libkf5pimcommon-dev (>= 4:22.12.3~), pkg-kde-tools (>= 0.12), qtbase5-dev (>= 5.15.2~), xauth, xvfb, build-essential, fakeroot
> dpkg-deb: building package 'sbuild-build-depends-main-dummy' in '/<<RESOLVERDIR>>/apt_archive/sbuild-build-depends-main-dummy.deb'.
> Ign:1 copy:/<<RESOLVERDIR>>/apt_archive ./ InRelease
> Get:2 copy:/<<RESOLVERDIR>>/apt_archive ./ Release [615 B]
> Ign:3 copy:/<<RESOLVERDIR>>/apt_archive ./ Release.gpg
> Get:4 copy:/<<RESOLVERDIR>>/apt_archive ./ Sources [1057 B]
> Get:5 copy:/<<RESOLVERDIR>>/apt_archive ./ Packages [1090 B]
> Fetched 2762 B in 0s (0 B/s)
> Reading package lists...
> Reading package lists...
>
> Install main build dependencies (apt-based resolver)
> ----------------------------------------------------
>
> Installing build dependencies
> Reading package lists...
> Building dependency tree...
> Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have
> requested an impossible situation or if you are using the unstable
> distribution that some required packages have not yet been created
> or been moved out of Incoming.
> The following information may help to resolve the situation:
>
> The following packages have unmet dependencies:
> libkf5akonadicontact5 : Depends: akonadi-contacts-data (= 4:22.12.3-1) but 4:24.12.0-2 is to be installed
> libkf5akonadimime5 : Depends: akonadi-mime-data (= 4:22.12.3-1) but 4:24.12.0-2 is to be installed
> libkf5contacteditor5 : Depends: akonadi-contacts-data (= 4:22.12.3-1) but 4:24.12.0-2 is to be installed
> E: Unable to correct problems, you have held broken packages.
> apt-get failed.
The full build log is available from:
http://qa-logs.debian.net/2024/12/22/libkf5mailimporter_22.12.3-1_unstable.log
All bugs filed during this archive rebuild are listed at:
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?tag=ftbfs-20241222;users=lucas@debian.org
or:
https://udd.debian.org/bugs/?release=na&merged=ign&fnewerval=7&flastmodval=7&fusertag=only&fusertagtag=ftbfs-20241222&fusertaguser=lucas@debian.org&allbugs=1&cseverity=1&ctags=1&caffected=1#results
A list of current common problems and possible solutions is available at
http://wiki.debian.org/qa.debian.org/FTBFS . You're welcome to contribute!
If you reassign this bug to another package, please mark it as 'affects'-ing
this package. See https://www.debian.org/Bugs/server-control#affects
If you fail to reproduce this, please provide a build log and diff it with mine
so that we can identify if something relevant changed in the meantime.
Reply to: