Bug#1062390: t64 transition plans for these packages?
- To: 1062390@bugs.debian.org, 1062477@bugs.debian.org, 1062487@bugs.debian.org, 1062493@bugs.debian.org, 1062497@bugs.debian.org, 1062502@bugs.debian.org, 1062927@bugs.debian.org, 1062954@bugs.debian.org, 1063121@bugs.debian.org
- Subject: Bug#1062390: t64 transition plans for these packages?
- From: Steve Langasek <vorlon@debian.org>
- Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2024 12:26:56 -0800
- Message-id: <[🔎] Zd+XEBqLXWIeFrGx@homer.dodds.net>
- Reply-to: Steve Langasek <vorlon@debian.org>, 1062390@bugs.debian.org
- References: <[🔎] 170677734184.3652855.14062230155664582331.reportbug@homer.dodds.net>
Hello,
All of these bugs have been un-tagged 'pending', so as a result our batch
NMU scripting is skipping over them and we are currently not NMUing them to
unstable.
However, the bugs have not been closed, suggesting that they are invalid;
and there is no information in the bugs about maintainer plans for handling
these packages.
Could you please clarify what your intention is here?
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
Ubuntu Developer https://www.debian.org/
slangasek@ubuntu.com vorlon@debian.org
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Reply to: