[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#1005835: marked as done (qtbase-opensource-src: What's the recommended way to setup Debian for development using Qt?)

Your message dated Sat, 26 Feb 2022 23:48:39 +0300
with message-id <YhqSJ/6lUiBfGbAs@mitya57.me>
and subject line Re: Bug#1005835: qtbase-opensource-src: What's the recommended way to setup Debian for development using Qt?
has caused the Debian Bug report #1005835,
regarding qtbase-opensource-src: What's the recommended way to setup Debian for development using Qt?
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
1005835: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1005835
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Source: qtbase-opensource-src
X-Debbugs-Cc: d3faultdotxbe@gmail.com
Severity: wishlist

Dear Maintainer,

Once upon a time we could just do:
# apt install qt-sdk
This gave you an environment for developing with Qt, but actually installed
too much because it installed Qt Creator (and Qt can be used headless).

qt-sdk was never updated to Qt5, so in later Debian releases:
# apt install qt5-default
Was my go-to and I could even add 'qtcreator' if I wanted GUI stuff.

But now qt5-default is gone and there's a clusterfrick ton of qt5 packages,
none of which jump out at me as being all encompassing.

So what exactly is the recommended way to get a dev env for developing with Qt?
rdepends on qt5-default gives me:
# apt install qtbase5-dev qtchooser qt5-qmake qtbase5-dev-tools
But that's annoying to type and difficult to memorize. I do rdepends every time.
We need a metapackage or virtualpackage or somethin...

Thanks,
d3fault

p.s. I mean development *with* Qt, not development *of* Qt

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 11.2
  APT prefers stable-updates
  APT policy: (500, 'stable-updates'), (500, 'stable-security'), (500, 'stable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: i386

Kernel: Linux 5.10.0-11-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU threads)
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8), LANGUAGE not set
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /usr/bin/dash
Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)
LSM: AppArmor: enabled

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
Hi!

On Tue, Feb 15, 2022 at 12:07:38PM -0700, d3fault wrote:
> Source: qtbase-opensource-src
> X-Debbugs-Cc: d3faultdotxbe@gmail.com
> Severity: wishlist
>
> Dear Maintainer,
>
> Once upon a time we could just do:
> # apt install qt-sdk
> This gave you an environment for developing with Qt, but actually installed
> too much because it installed Qt Creator (and Qt can be used headless).
>
> qt-sdk was never updated to Qt5, so in later Debian releases:
> # apt install qt5-default
> Was my go-to and I could even add 'qtcreator' if I wanted GUI stuff.
>
> But now qt5-default is gone and there's a clusterfrick ton of qt5 packages,
> none of which jump out at me as being all encompassing.
>
> So what exactly is the recommended way to get a dev env for developing with Qt?
> rdepends on qt5-default gives me:
> # apt install qtbase5-dev qtchooser qt5-qmake qtbase5-dev-tools
> But that's annoying to type and difficult to memorize. I do rdepends every time.
> We need a metapackage or virtualpackage or somethin...

qtbase5-dev already depends on the other three packages, so you can just run
"apt install qtbase5-dev" and it will install everything.

Also, now we have qt6-base-dev in unstable too.

--
Dmitry Shachnev

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


--- End Message ---
Reply to: