On Thu, Nov 17, 2022 at 02:25:17PM -0700, Soren Stoutner wrote:
> Based on the lack of opposition, it seems that the following is the consensus
> for packaging .bdic files.
thanks for driving this silent resolution ahah :D
> 1. The .bdic files should be compiled at package creation time.
> 2. The .bdic files should be included in the existing Hunspell language binary
> packages.
well, I can confirm these 2 points match my preference, so…
> 3. The .bdic files should be installed in /usr/share/hunspell-bdic.
… and I don't really have an opinion here.
What I do want to see *before* we actually release a lo-dicts with these
is something that actually reads and make use of them *first*.
> At this point, the only question left is where this should be documented and
> who should write the documentation. I am assuming that /usr/share/doc/
> dictionaries-common-dev/dsdt-policy.html is the correct place for
> documentation. I am willing to submit a PR if nobody else prefers to do so
> instead.
mh, what documentation are you talking about??
--
regards,
Mattia Rizzolo
GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18 4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540 .''`.
More about me: https://mapreri.org : :' :
Launchpad user: https://launchpad.net/~mapreri `. `'`
Debian QA page: https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=mattia `-
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature