[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Bug#1020387: dictionaries-common: Consensus regarding the packaging of the Qt WebEngine hunspell binary dictionaries



On Sunday, November 13, 2022 3:13:55 PM MST Agustin Martin wrote:

> It is to note that even that 10 years code apparently has support for

> the IGNORE flag, unsupported by the .bdic dicts. Fortunately, seems

> that there are not many dicts using that flag in

> libreoffice-dictionaries.

>

> libreoffice-dictionaries-7.4.2$ grep -r IGNORE *

> dictionaries/bo/bo.aff:IGNORE ༵༷

> dictionaries/ar/ar.aff:IGNORE ًٌٍَُِّْـٰ

> dictionaries/uk_UA/uk_UA.aff:IGNORE ́

> dictionaries/ckb/dictionaries/ckb.aff:IGNORE ًٌٍَُِّْـٰ١٢٣٤۴٥۵٦۶٧٨٩٠

> dictionaries/hu_HU/hu_HU.aff:IGNORE ()]


Thanks for catching these additional languages with the IGNORE command in their .aff file.


I added notes to the Tibetan bug report:


https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1020479


And to the LibreOffice dictionaries bug report, which ships Hungarian and Ukrainian:


https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1020479


The issue with Arabic was previously reported:


https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1020481


I was not able to find ckb.aff in the Debian archive.  There is a ckb_IQ.aff which links to kmr_Latn.cff in the hunspell-kmr package, but that file does not include an IGNORE command and doesn’t produce an error when compiled to the .bdic format.  Does anyone know if ckb.aff exists in Debian?


https://packages.debian.org/search?searchon=contents&keywords=ckb.aff&mode=path&suite=unstable&arch=any



--

Soren Stoutner

soren@stoutner.com

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.


Reply to: