[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#899144: marked as done ([oxygen-icon-theme] Please include scalable version)



Your message dated Sun, 31 Jul 2022 15:18:16 +0200
with message-id <2840452.e9J7NaK4W3@grummly>
and subject line Closing as wont
has caused the Debian Bug report #899144,
regarding [oxygen-icon-theme] Please include scalable version
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
899144: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=899144
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: oxygen-icon-theme
Version: 5:5.45.0-1
Severity: important
control: tags -1 + patch

Hi,

Some package packages scalable version (svg) of this theme. Could be possible 
to get scalable version here in order to create symbolic link and reduce code 
duplication

Here patch untested by could help
Index: oxygen-icons5-5.46.0/CMakeLists.txt
===================================================================
--- oxygen-icons5-5.46.0.orig/CMakeLists.txt
+++ oxygen-icons5-5.46.0/CMakeLists.txt
@@ -18,7 +18,7 @@ include(KDECompilerSettings NO_POLICY_SC
 # Dependencies
 set(REQUIRED_QT_VERSION 5.8.0)
 
-set( oxygen_icon_dirs  8x8 16x16 22x22 32x32 48x48 64x64 128x128 256x256 )
+set( oxygen_icon_dirs  8x8 16x16 22x22 32x32 48x48 64x64 128x128 256x256 scalable)
 
 add_subdirectory(autotests)
 

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---

control: -1 tags + wontfix


Oxygen is not developped actively upstream anymore so marking this bug as wontfix.


--- End Message ---

Reply to: