[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#969612: marked as done (krfb: please transition to pipewire 0.3, initially in experimental)



Your message dated Fri, 11 Sep 2020 05:48:31 +0000
with message-id <E1kGbvD-0003hY-Hq@fasolo.debian.org>
and subject line Bug#969612: fixed in krfb 4:20.08.1-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #969612,
regarding krfb: please transition to pipewire 0.3, initially in experimental
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
969612: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=969612
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: krfb
Version: 4:20.08.1-1
Severity: normal
Control: block #966535 by -1

pipewire 0.3 has now hit experimental. As discussed in #966535 and
on #debian-kde, the first step for transition #966535 is to make sure
the few packages that currently B-D on pipewire 0.2 can be recompiled
with 0.3. It would be great if you could do this in experimental soon
(please close this bug with that upload), and either be ready to re-upload
to unstable when the transition starts, or accept a 0-day NMU with the
same change.

krfb seems to support both APIs upstream via some #ifdefs, so it should
just be a matter of applying this pseudo-patch:

-               libpipewire-0.2-dev [linux-any],
+               libpipewire-0.2-dev [linux-any],

and checking that the result builds (and, ideally, that it works).

Thanks,
    smcv

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: krfb
Source-Version: 4:20.08.1-2
Done: Pino Toscano <pino@debian.org>

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
krfb, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive.

A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 969612@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Pino Toscano <pino@debian.org> (supplier of updated krfb package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmaster@ftp-master.debian.org)


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

Format: 1.8
Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2020 07:20:49 +0200
Source: krfb
Architecture: source
Version: 4:20.08.1-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian/Kubuntu Qt/KDE Maintainers <debian-qt-kde@lists.debian.org>
Changed-By: Pino Toscano <pino@debian.org>
Closes: 969612
Changes:
 krfb (4:20.08.1-2) unstable; urgency=medium
 .
   * Team upload.
 .
   [ Simon McVittie ]
   * Build with libpipewire-0.3-dev (Closes: #969612)
Checksums-Sha1:
 0e122eb2f7933d3b2d716f5c128b317e1214ff3e 3075 krfb_20.08.1-2.dsc
 1baaa4eb5628b9a19874f1dc248f947b52c0260d 8892 krfb_20.08.1-2.debian.tar.xz
 4a9b333502ba3ef42357762bdda4b3debec57cf7 19260 krfb_20.08.1-2_source.buildinfo
Checksums-Sha256:
 7fd4b213dd08e54fc91cfbb098d1540cd2eba556f50da0f0936b90d448fb5523 3075 krfb_20.08.1-2.dsc
 d18111ade06a8d5c2a3f75311fcbd42d267ce6ee1a9ad8a5122d79fd4b351b0a 8892 krfb_20.08.1-2.debian.tar.xz
 6030bfe7808628d46363f11f6400dfe933981e210cd38c084676e0c84453918d 19260 krfb_20.08.1-2_source.buildinfo
Files:
 b8805cc2bb0738d05b8c805f3e17a98b 3075 kde optional krfb_20.08.1-2.dsc
 b9be179b232fdded930d661357784b56 8892 kde optional krfb_20.08.1-2.debian.tar.xz
 146a293a87d9e6c02d6f2d24b4c986ff 19260 kde optional krfb_20.08.1-2_source.buildinfo

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=dMQW
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--- End Message ---

Reply to: