In data mercoledì 19 agosto 2020 17:54:47 CEST, Drew Parsons ha scritto: > On 2020-08-19 23:42, Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer wrote: > > I have updated okular and, while the bug is important I fail to see it > > as an RC bug. Most of okular's functionality is still there and > > working perfectly. > > > > I am not downgrading the bug severity because Pino did a first review > > and I might be missing something else. > > > Since it was a new release just uploaded to unstable, I marked it RC to > halt it from migrating to testing, at least until you had a chance to > review the problem. It's only the one piece of functionality that's > broken, but it's broken bad. (And for me, it's the functionality that I > like to use okular for). > > I'm happy for Pino to make the judgement to downgrade severity if you > and he thinks the new version is fit to go into testing. I understand the concern related to the bug introduced by the new version. I found an upstream bug that seems the same issue: https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=425354 feel free to join it, and provide your feedback. Also, note that your point #1 is sort of invalid, as the design of the annotation toolbar was changed upstream. OTOH, all the other functionalities such as - opening and displaying any kind of document - dealing with attachments - dealing with forms - printing - all the various options/settings - showing the existing annotations - even modifying the properties of existing annotations - removing existing annotations work fine, TTBOMK. So yes, we have a bug that prevents creating new annotations, however it is just one of the possible functionalities. Because of this... > I think, and for that reason I've > marked this bug as Severity grave, "makes the package in question > mostly unusable" ... I disagree with this statement: the package in question is _not_ mostly unusable. -- Pino Toscano
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.