[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#958185: marked as done (meta-kde: Don't depend on cantor, RC buggy and prevents hdf5 migration)

Your message dated Sun, 19 Apr 2020 17:06:04 +0200
with message-id <2102545.rsdq20LIAh@thyrus>
and subject line Re: Bug#958185: meta-kde: Don't depend on cantor, RC buggy and prevents hdf5 migration
has caused the Debian Bug report #958185,
regarding meta-kde: Don't depend on cantor, RC buggy and prevents hdf5 migration
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
958185: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=958185
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Source: meta-kde
Version: 5:104
Severity: important
Tags: patch
Control: block 954654 by -1

Dear Maintainer,

Please apply the attached patch to not depend on cantor, it's RC buggy and
prevents the hdf5 transition from completing, see:

 https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=954654#56

Kind Regards,

Bas

diff -Nru meta-kde-104/debian/changelog meta-kde-104.1/debian/changelog
--- meta-kde-104/debian/changelog	2019-08-26 19:06:45.000000000 +0200
+++ meta-kde-104.1/debian/changelog	2020-04-19 14:57:03.000000000 +0200
@@ -1,3 +1,11 @@
+meta-kde (5:104.1) UNRELEASED; urgency=medium
+
+  * Non-maintainer upload.
+  * Don't depend on cantor, RC buggy and prevents hdf5 migration, see:
+    https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=954654#56
+
+ -- Bas Couwenberg <sebastic@debian.org>  Sun, 19 Apr 2020 14:57:03 +0200
+
 meta-kde (5:104) unstable; urgency=medium
 
   * Team upload.
diff -Nru meta-kde-104/debian/control meta-kde-104.1/debian/control
--- meta-kde-104/debian/control	2019-08-26 19:06:45.000000000 +0200
+++ meta-kde-104.1/debian/control	2020-04-19 14:56:46.000000000 +0200
@@ -156,7 +156,6 @@
 Architecture: any
 Depends: artikulate (>= ${kde:Version}),
          blinken (>= ${kde:Version}),
-         cantor (>= ${kde:Version}),
          kalgebra (>= ${kde:Version}) [amd64 arm64 armhf i386 mipsel],
          kalzium (>= ${kde:Version}),
          kanagram (>= ${kde:Version}),

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
In data domenica 19 aprile 2020 15:32:15 CEST, Pino Toscano ha scritto:
> In data domenica 19 aprile 2020 15:27:23 CEST, Sebastiaan Couwenberg ha scritto:
> > On 4/19/20 3:16 PM, Pino Toscano wrote:
> > >> Please apply the attached patch to not depend on cantor, it's RC buggy and
> > >> prevents the hdf5 transition from completing, see:
> > >>
> > >>  https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=954654#56
> > > 
> > > Sorry, but I do not agree with this fix.
> > > 
> > > First of all, there are no bug reports against cantor, so knowing
> > > about it would be a nice thing. Second, it seems like the actual
> > > problem is scilab that FTBFS on amd64 (#955694). Cantor is definitely
> > > *not* RC buggy.
> > > 
> > > So please contact the scilab maintainers about this, and let them fix
> > > it if possible. If not, then we can (temporarly?) drop the scilab
> > > backend from cantor, with no need to drop it from the kdeedu
> > > metapackage.
> > 
> > The problem is that kdeedu Depends on cantor which Depends on scilab. To
> > quote the linked post in the hdf5 transition bugreport:
> > 
> > "
> >  Basically we could remove cdo, ruby-hdfeos5 (or wait for it to be a
> >  candidate but I would remove it now to finish this) and scilab.
> >  Unfortunately after checking with dak, I found that tasksel depends on
> >  meta-kde, which depends on cantor, which depends on scilab, which means
> >  that scilab is going to need a fix for #955694 in order for this
> >  transition to finish.
> > "
> 
> Yes, I did read that, and it even says what I wrote, i.e. that scilab
> requires a FTBFS fix. Before adding more work on our (qt-kde) side, can
> you please ping again the scilab maintainers (Julien Puydt in
> particular), and wait a couple of days for an answer?
> 
> > Since a fix for scilab is not forthcoming, we need a different solution
> > to allow hdf5 to migrate to testing. The next best thing is for meta-kde
> > to not Depends on cantor which won't make it nor its dependencies like
> > scilab a key package.
> 
> No, the next best thing is what I wrote earlier, i.e. drop the scilab
> backend from cantor. I don't see a reason to drop cantor from testing
> altogether just because one part of it might not be usable because of
> other packages.

#958189 was opened to deal with the scilab dependency issue in cantor;
hence, this bug can be closed as invalid.

Thanks,
-- 
Pino Toscano

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.


--- End Message ---
Reply to: