[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#940565: marked as done (PySide2 segfaults with Python3. Message: "SystemError: could not initialize part 1" (shiboken))



Your message dated Mon, 23 Dec 2019 10:16:37 +0100
with message-id <75ad7ad5-12fa-df53-a4bf-be2a26fc949a@freexian.com>
and subject line Re: Update
has caused the Debian Bug report #940565,
regarding PySide2 segfaults with Python3. Message: "SystemError: could not initialize part 1" (shiboken)
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
940565: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=940565
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: pyside2
Version: 5.11.2-3
Severity: grave

The file test.py contains a single line (without the "> " quotation):
> import PySide2.QtCore as core

Running
> python3 test.py
results in a segfault with output:
> SystemError: could not initialize part 1
FWIW, I could trace that message to sources/shiboken2/libshiboken/signature.cpp in the pyside2 orig.tar

Running the script with python instead of python3 gives no error.
The same behaviour occurs with other Pyside2 modules instead of QtCore.

> uname -a
> Linux debian 4.19.0-6-amd64 #1 SMP Debian 4.19.67-2 (2019-08-28) x86_64 GNU/Linux

> ls -l /lib/*/libc.so.6
> lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 12 Mai  1 19:24 /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6 -> libc-2.28.so

The machine in question runs in a VirtualBox VM.

Best regards,

  Mark Weyer

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---

As there is no more segfault and it's a Python3 error, not a pyside 2 I think I can close this bug.

Sophie


--- End Message ---

Reply to: