Bug#243241: marked as done (knode: attachment save names wrong)
Your message dated Tue, 20 Aug 2019 03:57:25 +0000
with message-id <[🔎] E1hzvGv-0005Lm-6t@fasolo.debian.org>
and subject line Bug#935024: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #243241,
regarding knode: attachment save names wrong
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
243241: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=243241
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
- To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
- Subject: knode: attachment save names wrong
- From: Christophe Devriese <oelewapperke@ulyssis.org>
- Date: Mon, 12 Apr 2004 01:22:24 +0200
- Message-id: <20040411232132.0062F4C0D1@antonius.kulnet.kuleuven.ac.be>
Package: knode
Version: 4:3.2.1-1
Severity: important
Tags: sid
If you save multiple attachments, the name filled into the save as
dialog box is always the name of the first attachment, so if you just
click "save" everywhere it overwrites the first attachment.
Very annoying.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.4.22
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C
Versions of packages knode depends on:
ii kdelibs4 4:3.2.1-1 KDE core libraries
ii libart-2.0-2 2.3.16-1 Library of functions for 2D graphi
ii libc6 2.3.2.ds1-11 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii libfam0c102 2.7.0-5 client library to control the FAM
ii libgcc1 1:3.3.3-2 GCC support library
ii libice6 4.3.0-5 Inter-Client Exchange library
ii libkdenetwork2 4:3.2.1-1 KDE Network library
ii libkdepim1 4:3.2.1-1 KDE PIM library
ii libmimelib1 4:3.2.1-1 KDE mime library
ii libpng12-0 1.2.5.0-5 PNG library - runtime
ii libqt3c102-mt 3:3.2.3-2 Qt GUI Library (Threaded runtime v
ii libsm6 4.3.0-5 X Window System Session Management
ii libstdc++5 1:3.3.3-2 The GNU Standard C++ Library v3
ii libx11-6 4.3.0-5 X Window System protocol client li
ii libxext6 4.3.0-5 X Window System miscellaneous exte
ii libxrender1 0.8.3-7 X Rendering Extension client libra
ii xlibs 4.3.0-5 X Window System client libraries m
ii zlib1g 1:1.2.1-5 compression library - runtime
-- no debconf information
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
- To: 194861-done@bugs.debian.org,225321-done@bugs.debian.org,226465-done@bugs.debian.org,243241-done@bugs.debian.org,268652-done@bugs.debian.org,272848-done@bugs.debian.org,279416-done@bugs.debian.org,327403-done@bugs.debian.org,389045-done@bugs.debian.org,432001-done@bugs.debian.org,607345-done@bugs.debian.org,608549-done@bugs.debian.org,610269-done@bugs.debian.org,631918-done@bugs.debian.org,784480-done@bugs.debian.org,874947-done@bugs.debian.org,879327-done@bugs.debian.org,
- Cc: kdepim4@packages.debian.org
- Subject: Bug#935024: Removed package(s) from unstable
- From: Debian FTP Masters <ftpmaster@ftp-master.debian.org>
- Date: Tue, 20 Aug 2019 03:57:25 +0000
- Message-id: <[🔎] E1hzvGv-0005Lm-6t@fasolo.debian.org>
Version: 4:4.14.10-7+rm
Dear submitter,
as the package kdepim4 has just been removed from the Debian archive
unstable we hereby close the associated bug reports. We are sorry
that we couldn't deal with your issue properly.
For details on the removal, please see https://bugs.debian.org/935024
The version of this package that was in Debian prior to this removal
can still be found using http://snapshot.debian.org/.
This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is
a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing
ftpmaster@ftp-master.debian.org.
Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Scott Kitterman (the ftpmaster behind the curtain)
--- End Message ---
Reply to: