[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#933960: qtbase-opensource-src: .tag files do not belong into doc packages



Hi Jiri!

El vie., 9 ago. 2019 11:21, Jiri Palecek <jpalecek@web.de> escribió:
On Mon, 05 Aug 2019 11:45:54 -0300 =?utf-8?q?Lisandro_Dami=C3=A1n_Nicanor_P=C3=A9rez_Meyer?= wrote:
> Source: qtbase-opensource-src
> Version: 5.11.3+dfsg1-2
> Severity: normal
>
> Jonathan Ridell just reported that some KDE packages (and then Scarlett checked
> that Qt has the same issue) ship the .tags files within foo-doc packages.

Yes. I have reported that about half a year ago as 922707.


Sorry for the duplicate. We haven't got to a full bug triage since the freeze, so we might miss some bugs.

> It turns out that the .tags files are used for linking docs, thus more of a

> development file.

Yes. And generated apidocs in debian-built packages are suboptimal because of this.


Correct. Hopefully this will get solved soonish.

> We need to consider if we have to move this files or not within Qt. If we have

> then we might tackle the xml files for examples too (see #933597).

This change is already commited in the Salsa repository.


Right, Scarlett went ahead with them, thanks Scarlett!



BTW the other culprits in this business are:


[Snip all doc packages]


Do we need a separate bug for every one of them?


Ideally one per qt submodule source package that ships -doc packages. But not entirely necessary now it's on our radar

Thanks, Lisandro.

Reply to: