[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Debian 9.11 and QT5 libQt5WebEngineCore crash



Hi!

On Thu, 17 Oct 2019 at 11:33, Jeffrey Walton <noloader@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Everyone,
>
> I'm building notepadqq (https://github.com/notepadqq/notepadqq) from
> sources on Debian 9.11, x86_64, fully patched. notepadqq uses QT5.
>
> notepadqq crashes on startup. dmesg shows this:
>
> [   22.553525] VBoxService 5.2.30 r130521 (verbosity: 0) linux.amd64
> (May 13 2019 15:16:17) release log
>                00:00:00.000107 main     Log opened
> 2019-10-17T14:01:01.590866000Z
> [   22.553552] 00:00:00.000162 main     OS Product: Linux
> [   22.553566] 00:00:00.000179 main     OS Release: 4.9.0-9-amd64
> [   22.553578] 00:00:00.000191 main     OS Version: #1 SMP Debian
> 4.9.168-1+deb9u3 (2019-06-16)
> [   22.553594] 00:00:00.000204 main     Executable:
> /opt/VBoxGuestAdditions-5.2.30/sbin/VBoxService
>                00:00:00.000204 main     Process ID: 956
>                00:00:00.000204 main     Package type: LINUX_64BITS_GENERIC
> [   22.555155] 00:00:00.001753 main     5.2.30 r130521 started.
> Verbose level = 0
> [   26.798496] gnome-shell[1073]: segfault at 0 ip           (null) sp
> 00007ffd9302a408 error 14 in gnome-shell[55e4ab414000+4000]
> [   27.269074] gnome-shell[1133]: segfault at 0 ip           (null) sp
> 00007fff2fe58628 error 14 in gnome-shell[55afebbcf000+4000]
> [   73.565442] fuse init (API version 7.26)
> [  495.755312] Chrome_InProcGp[2963]: segfault at 0 ip
> 00007f6452c328ed sp 00007f63cdff9aa0 error 4 in
> libQt5WebEngineCore.so.5.7.1[7f64525f7000+4db2000]
>
>
> My question is, is this a bug I should pursue with Debian and/or QT:
> https://github.com/notepadqq/notepadqq/issues/913 ? Or maybe
> VirtualBox folks? Or should I pursue it with someone else?
>
> Thanks in advance.

This sound smore like a bug in VirtualBox while using gnome-shell, so
I can't help you here :-(

-- 
Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer
http://perezmeyer.com.ar/
http://perezmeyer.blogspot.com/


Reply to: