[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#924799: qtspeech-opensource-src: FTBFS: dh_auto_test: make -j4 check -Ctests/auto QT_HASH_SEED=0 QT_QPA_PLATFORM=minimal returned exit code 2



Hi,

On 17/03/19 at 18:06 -0300, Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer wrote:
> El domingo, 17 de marzo de 2019 17:54:39 -03 Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez 
> Meyer escribió:
> > Hi Lucas!
> > 
> > El domingo, 17 de marzo de 2019 15:20:23 -03 Lucas Nussbaum escribió:
> > > Source: qtspeech-opensource-src
> > > Version: 5.11.3-2
> > > Severity: serious
> > > Tags: buster sid
> > > User: debian-qa@lists.debian.org
> > > Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20190315 qa-ftbfs
> > > Justification: FTBFS in buster on amd64
> > > 
> > > Hi,
> > > 
> > > During a rebuild of all packages in buster (in a buster chroot, not a
> > > sid chroot), your package failed to build on amd64.
> > 
> > [snip]
> > 
> > This:
> > > > "Failed to start audio output (error 1)" BFAIL  :
> > And then:
> > > > FAIL!  : tst_QTextToSpeech::volume() 'tts.volume() > 0.65' returned
> > > > FALSE.
> > 
> > Makes me think if the test is failing due to no audio setup in your VMs.
> > Maybe we have hit an interesting bug which was never caught on the buildds?
> > Should a buildd have audio setup?
> 
> The problem seems to be different, as I can reproduce it on a porterbox 
> (except barriere also has no audio).
> 
> Non the less I'm still interested in knowing if your VMs provide an audio 
> setup.

AFAIK they don't, but that shouldn't be a requirement to build the
package?

Lucas

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: