Bug#920357: partitionmanager: When I format a usb-stick to ext4 using partitionmanager the result will be read only for users
Package: partitionmanager
Version: 3.3.1-5
Severity: normal
Dear Maintainer,
*** Reporter, please consider answering these questions, where appropriate ***
* What led up to the situation?
I used partitionmanager to format a usb drive
* What exactly did you do (or not do) that was effective (or
ineffective)?
I followed partitionmanager completely. I formatted some usb drives to ext4
* What was the outcome of this action?
The outcome whas that the formatted drive was - is always - read only for users
* What outcome did you expect instead?
I expected to be able to write to the usb-stick as a user
*** End of the template - remove these template lines ***
-- System Information:
Debian Release: buster/sid
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (500, 'testing')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: i386
Kernel: Linux 4.18.0-2-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=nl_NL.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=nl_NL.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8), LANGUAGE= (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /usr/bin/dash
Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)
LSM: AppArmor: enabled
Versions of packages partitionmanager depends on:
ii kio 5.54.1-1
ii libc6 2.28-5
ii libkf5configcore5 5.54.0-1
ii libkf5configgui5 5.54.0-1
ii libkf5configwidgets5 5.54.0-1
ii libkf5coreaddons5 5.54.0-1
ii libkf5crash5 5.54.0-1
ii libkf5i18n5 5.54.0-1
ii libkf5iconthemes5 5.54.0-1
ii libkf5jobwidgets5 5.54.0-1
ii libkf5kiocore5 5.54.1-1
ii libkf5kiowidgets5 5.54.1-1
ii libkf5widgetsaddons5 5.54.0-1
ii libkf5xmlgui5 5.54.0-1
ii libkpmcore7 3.3.0-4
ii libqt5core5a 5.11.3+dfsg-2
ii libqt5gui5 5.11.3+dfsg-2
ii libqt5widgets5 5.11.3+dfsg-2
ii libstdc++6 8.2.0-14
partitionmanager recommends no packages.
Versions of packages partitionmanager suggests:
pn btrfs-progs <none>
ii dosfstools 4.1-2
pn hfsplus <none>
pn hfsutils <none>
pn jfsutils <none>
ii ntfs-3g 1:2017.3.23AR.3-2
pn reiser4progs <none>
pn reiserfsprogs <none>
ii xfsprogs 4.15.1-1
-- no debconf information
Reply to: