In data lunedì 14 gennaio 2019 12:22:52 CET, Scott Kitterman ha scritto: > On Thu, 01 Nov 2018 14:04:12 -0300 Lisandro > =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Dami=E1n_Nicanor_P=E9rez?= Meyer <perezmeyer@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Wed, 17 Oct 2018 15:57:25 +0200 Ivo De Decker <ivodd@debian.org> wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > On Fri, Nov 24, 2017 at 04:59:58PM -0300, Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez > > Meyer wrote: > > > > Control: tag -1 patch > > > > > > > > There is patch available for this at > <https://git.archlinux.org/svntogit/ > > > > packages.git/tree/trunk/kdelibs-no-kdewebkit.patch?h=packages/kdelibs> > > > > > > > > We might want to wait for the last tandem of KF5 apps though. > > > > > > Is there anything still blocking this? > > > > Yes, at least one co maintainer believes the kde-runtime patch is not > > appropriate. > > That patch no longer seems to be available, so I made my own. Patches for > kde4libs and kde-runtime attached. I looked at the KDE4 packages still in > Buster and I don't believe this interferes with anything. This also fixes the > FTBFS with Samba 4.9 by dropping the KDE4 kio_smb. The samba compatibility issue is a different story, and it can be fixed by just disabling kio_smb (in case it requires non-trivial work to make it work again). > I think we should move forward on these (or some improved version if someone > has suggestions). > > Even though there are separate bugs for kde-runtime, since the patch for it > was already discussed in this bug, I thought we might as well keep them > together. Did you check that all the packages using kde4libs still build fine? The removal of kio_thumbnail from kde-runtime is definitely not appropriate, since it will break the thunbnail support for any kdelibs 4.x application. Again: something worth to mention, since apparently it is not clear: removing bits from either kde4libs or kde-runtime has consequences, either build time or runtime ones. Randomly chopping pieces without checking what changes, and potentially what breaks, is generally a big no-no from me. I do not see how "remove qtwebkit" is an excuse to start messing up with packages, just for the sake of package removal. -- Pino Toscano
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.