Hi Bastian! El viernes, 4 de enero de 2019 08:52:14 -03 Bastian Blank escribió: > Hi > > On Fri, Jan 04, 2019 at 08:28:34AM -0300, Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer wrote: > > El viernes, 4 de enero de 2019 07:10:09 -03 Bastian Blank escribió: > > > Please don't re-use versions. > > > > I understand that by: "if you uploaded 1.2.3-1 don't reupload 1.2.3-1, bu > > better 1.2.3-2" Is that right? If it is: what's the problem? The package > > has never reached the archive, so it virtually never existed. Except some > > tool requires it :-/ > > We index our notes on packages by name+version, but we don't keep a full > history. So while cleaning up my own notes I found a matching package > and only a deep look showed that this is not longer the same. I see, fair point. Is this preference published somewhere (doc, wiki, whatever)? > > > po/ca/* and others are LGPL 2.1 or 3, without generic or later clause, > > > so "LGPL-2.1+ or LGPL-3+" is incorrect. > > > > Fair, but does it *really* deserves a reject? The license is still dfsg > > compliant and there is only one tiny little fix which can be fixed on the > > next upload. An accept + RC bug could also work here. > > For attributions we now tend to do that, but not for listing too broad > licenses. There might be some logic behind that I guess. That's also fair. Not to "bang you" (sorry, english vocabulary missing for this one) with this to you specifically, but it would be really *awesome* if all this details could be read somewhere. Thanks for your replies! -- Super cow powers | bbq > /dev/stomach Traveler1, seen on #debian-ar, irc.oftc.net Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer http://perezmeyer.com.ar/ http://perezmeyer.blogspot.com/
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.