El martes, 20 de febrero de 2018 20:06:58 -03 Daniel Schepler escribió: [snip] Right solution: please read below. > Well, I guess https://release.debian.org/buster/rc_policy.txt doesn't > explicitly state this: > > ----- > 4. Autobuilding > > Packages must list any packages they require to build beyond those > that are "build-essential" in the appropriate Build-Depends: fields. > > ... > > Packages must autobuild without failure on all architectures on > which they are supported. ... > ----- > > But still, my interpretation of the spirit is that the Build-Depends > and Build-Conflicts together have to be sufficient to ensure the > package builds both successfully and correctly. And that there's no > requirement that everybody building it must necessarily be using a > minimal chroot, or even any chroot at all. (Otherwise, what would the > purpose of Build-Conflicts be in the first place?) I understand your point, but I still think it does not merits a RC severity. Of course if the Release Team disagrees there would be nothing to discuss :-) Anyways we can definitely add Build-Confilcts: cmake <!nocheck> in our next upload. WRT the right solution: I *suspect* that the bug might not be in the test itself, but I haven't checked. -- "Los pibes no piden que levantemos un muro para que tengan un límite, sino que los ayudemos a crecer en libertad." Padre Bergoglio - http://www.lanacion.com.ar/1153060 Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer http://perezmeyer.com.ar/ http://perezmeyer.blogspot.com/
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.