El viernes, 27 de julio de 2018 10:28:20 -03 John Paul Adrian Glaubitz escribió: > On 07/27/2018 02:48 PM, Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer wrote: > > It will also mean that we Qt maintainers will start receiving valid bugs. > > Considering the ratio of work and manpower we have now it's not something > > we would like to deal with. Now if you can somehow chime in here, well, > > we can make an arrangement of some type I guess. > > I'm not sure what problem you are seeing here but I don't think that a > missing documentation generation tool will have any negative impact on > binary-only builds. > > qttools itself is only using qdoc in its binary-arch-indep target why should > that be any different for any of the other Qt packages? qdoc is generated two times: one during the binary build in order to ship it so other packages can create .qch documentation, and the other during the indep build in order to generate qttool's own .qch documentation. > > Maybe by opening a bug due to qdoc removal on some archs might help, you > > could subscribe there if needed. > > I'm not sure I understand this statement. If qdoc is not there in the first > place, how can it be removed? Does the explanation above solves this? Please do not hesitate in asking me again, I want this to be clear. > >> I think that this is similar to the case discussed in #897667, not being > >> able to build qt4-x11 makes big portions of the archive unbuildable, > >> many thousands of packages. Not being able to build > >> qttools-opensource-src will have a similar effect, I think. > > > > Yes, I'm afraid so. But first we would need patches. I doubt John's patch > > will work as I think Dmitry built the package first, FTBFS and then he > > added the llvm dependency. And if qdoc is not being built the .install > > files need also adjustment. > > The debian/rules file is already written such that it will not build any > documentation when DEB_HOST_ARCH != DEB_BUILD_ARCH, so unless Dmitry put > these statements there without any testing, I'm sure you can build qttools > without qdoc. Right, qttools but not the other docs. > > But again, I'll be happy to be shown otherwise. > > Working on it. Waiting for the build dependencies to get built. Excellent :-) -- perezmeyer: Gus no tiene inet :-( PabloOdorico: oh perezmeyer: te mando una copia de lo que hagamos esta noche PabloOdorico: de ultima mandame un loro del parque con una flash en la pata ;) Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer http://perezmeyer.com.ar/ http://perezmeyer.blogspot.com/
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.