El jueves, 14 de junio de 2018 20:42:21 -03 none escribió:
> Hello,
>
> >> If you refuse to fix it for Qt4, please fix it for Qt5 !
> >
> > - With respect to static libraries: we refuse for any version of Qt :-)
>
> But, why ? Why make such exception ?
https://wiki.debian.org/StaticLinking#Downsides
So non static libraries.
> > - With respect cross compiling: you should *really* try with Qt5. It
> > rocks.
> > Well, at least it has abeen a pleasure for the projects I keep so far
> >
> > :-)
>
> No, because of porting, it doesn't. But that time, that's on my side.
> Though please note that no Bitcoin forks got ported to qt5 in general,
> ever (not Bitcoin core itself, not Litecoin, not Peercoin. among more
> than 5000 cryptocurrencies they all use qt4 when the gui feature is
> available).
Well, they better do the switch, there will be no Qt4 in the near future.
> Qt5 still rely heavily on /proc/cpuinfo for building which returns the
> wrong architecture (hence the problem above).
I have never heard this, please enlighten me :-)
> I have no reason to port
> to qt5
If we get to it, no more Qt4 in Debian buster. Worst case scenario: Buster+1.
Really, Qt4 has been dead upstream since literally years.
--
__________________________________
< ¿Nunca viste a una vaca hablar? >
----------------------------------
\ ^__^
\ (oo)\_______
(__)\ )\/\
||----w |
|| ||
Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer
http://perezmeyer.com.ar/
http://perezmeyer.blogspot.com/
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.