¡Hola Paul! El 2018-05-30 a las 21:29 +0200, Paul Gevers escribió:
Hmm, I can't find the messages on lists.debian.org with their message-id (tried two), so they are probably lost (they were sent as I CC-ed myself and I received the messages).
For the record, all sent on 2018-05-20 around 19:56 UTC+02: Message-ID: <1526839020.2732131-elbrus@testavoira.debian.org> Message-ID: <1526839018.9428892-elbrus@testavoira.debian.org> Message-ID: <1526839016.5067074-elbrus@testavoira.debian.org> Message-ID: <1526839019.5896761-elbrus@testavoira.debian.org> Message-ID: <1526839018.344501-elbrus@testavoira.debian.org> Message-ID: <1526839017.09134-elbrus@testavoira.debian.org> Message-ID: <1526839017.724839-elbrus@testavoira.debian.org>
My experience sending mails as @debian.org to lists.debian.org is that mails get a spam score and so they may be considered as spam if any other rule gives your mail some extra points. That's the reason why I'm sending the mails as gnuservers.com.ar. I see that your mail was delivered to a release.debian.org machine, and maybe that avoids the mentioned scoring, are the mails sent from testavoira.debian.org also delivered to respighi.debian.org (via submission, I'm guessing)?
Anyway, could you resend us those mails?
No, I don't, that is why I ask you as the maintainer. But if you have reasons for the "we currently don't care" for the baloo-widgets autopkgtest, I could have helped you to speed up the migration if the gain is worth that regression.
All right, I had misunderstood your original email.Given that the test is also failing in upstream's ci, and no user seems to have any "new" issue with baloo, I don't see any gain in sending an rc bug to block the transition.
Happy hacking, -- "Inside every large problem is a small problem struggling to get out." -- Hoare's Law of Large Problems Saludos /\/\ /\ >< `/
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature