[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#865001: kscreen_backend[....]: segfault at 10 ip .... sp ... error 4 in KSC_XRandR.so



Package: libkf5screen-bin
Version: 4:5.8.6-2
Severity: normal

Dear Maintainer,

   * What led up to the situation?
     Not sure, but I suspect it's the result of setting the display resolution under KDE
     in my previous session

   * What exactly did you do (or not do) that was effective (or
     ineffective)?

     Fresh debian 9  install in QEMU (on a Fedora host)
     Selected KDE during install
     Installed fine, rebooted OK
     Logged into KDE session fine
     Increased screen res to 1440x900
     Set keyboard layout
     Logged out
     Tried to log back in
     
   * What was the outcome of this action?
     Logging in failed, it returned me back to the login manager
     a dmesg shows the:
          kscreen_backend[1507]: segfault at 10 ip 00007f73a0130568 sp 00007ffd29db5570 error 4 in KSC_XRandR.so[7f73a0116000+23000]
          addresses are changing each time, but the IP always seems to end in 568

   * What outcome did you expect instead?
     I could log back into KDE


-- System Information:
Debian Release: 9.0
  APT prefers stable
  APT policy: (500, 'stable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 4.9.0-3-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_GB.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8), LANGUAGE=en_GB:en (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)

Versions of packages libkf5screen-bin depends on:
ii  libc6                 2.24-11
ii  libkf5screen7         4:5.8.6-2
ii  libkf5waylandclient5  4:5.28.0-1
ii  libqt5core5a          5.7.1+dfsg-3+b1
ii  libqt5dbus5           5.7.1+dfsg-3+b1
ii  libqt5gui5            5.7.1+dfsg-3+b1
ii  libqt5x11extras5      5.7.1~20161021-2
ii  libstdc++6            6.3.0-18
ii  libxcb-randr0         1.12-1
ii  libxcb1               1.12-1

libkf5screen-bin recommends no packages.

libkf5screen-bin suggests no packages.

-- no debconf information


Reply to: