In data domenica 26 febbraio 2017 20:15:25 CET, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz ha scritto: > On 02/26/2017 07:48 PM, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote: > > I don't insist on anything. I noticed that this package does not depend on > > libssl after building and that is why I took a look. That is because it dlopen's libssl at runtime. > Interesting. So, I guess the best option would actually to drop the B-D on > libssl-dev completely. I have checked it myself and indeed libkf5khtml5 does > not depend on libssl at all. Plus, the package also builds fine with the > build dependency on libssl-dev completely removed. That is because it is an optional dependency. > Lisandro, maybe just dropping the build dependency on libssl-dev would be > the best option if it's actually not used at all? NACK. -- Pino Toscano
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.