[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#800550: marked as done (sddm-greeter suddenly stop)



Your message dated Mon, 20 Feb 2017 17:27:35 +0100
with message-id <20170220162734.qvba54flpjbsbu4y@gnuservers.com.ar>
and subject line Re: Bug#800550: sddm-greeter suddenly stop
has caused the Debian Bug report #800550,
regarding sddm-greeter suddenly stop
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
800550: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=800550
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: sddm
Version: 0.12.0-4
Severity: important

Dear Maintainer,

On my desktop, when sddm launching, two things could append :
- A window with a message "sddm-greeter suddenly stop". Can't do any just go
back to command line and stop the computer.
 - A black window with no things

sddm.log is empty, and kdm work find. I've a Nvidia graphic card with Nvidia
non-free driver.

$ dpkg --status sddm
Package: sddm
Status: install ok installed
Priority: optional
Section: kde
Installed-Size: 1231
Maintainer: Debian/Kubuntu Qt/KDE Maintainers <debian-qt-kde@lists.debian.org>
Architecture: amd64
Version: 0.12.0-4

$ dpkg --status plasma-desktop
Package: plasma-desktop
Status: install ok installed
Priority: optional
Section: kde
Installed-Size: 7622
Maintainer: Debian/Kubuntu Qt/KDE Maintainers <debian-qt-kde@lists.debian.org>
Architecture: amd64
Version: 4:5.4.1-1

$ dpkg --status nvidia-kernel-dkms
Package: nvidia-kernel-dkms
Status: install ok installed
Priority: optional
Section: non-free/kernel
Installed-Size: 13411
Maintainer: Debian NVIDIA Maintainers <pkg-nvidia-
devel@lists.alioth.debian.org>
Architecture: amd64
Multi-Arch: foreign
Source: nvidia-graphics-drivers
Version: 352.30-1

Regards

-- System Information:
Debian Release: stretch/sid
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: i386

Kernel: Linux 4.2.0-1-amd64 (SMP w/8 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)

Versions of packages sddm depends on:
ii  adduser                         3.113+nmu3
ii  debconf [debconf-2.0]           1.5.57
ii  libc6                           2.19-22
ii  libgcc1                         1:5.2.1-18
ii  libpam0g                        1.1.8-3.1
ii  libqt5core5a                    5.4.2+dfsg-9
ii  libqt5dbus5                     5.4.2+dfsg-9
ii  libqt5gui5                      5.4.2+dfsg-9
ii  libqt5network5                  5.4.2+dfsg-9
ii  libqt5qml5                      5.4.2-6
ii  libqt5quick5                    5.4.2-6
ii  libstdc++6                      5.2.1-18
ii  libsystemd0                     226-3
ii  libxcb-xkb1                     1.10-3+b1
ii  libxcb1                         1.10-3+b1
ii  qml-module-qtquick2             5.4.2-6
ii  sddm-theme-breeze [sddm-theme]  4:5.4.1-1

sddm recommends no packages.

Versions of packages sddm suggests:
ii  libpam-kwallet5  5.4.1-1

-- debconf information:
  sddm/daemon_name: /usr/bin/sddm
* shared/default-x-display-manager: kdm

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
¡Hola Marc!

El 2015-10-01 a las 18:03 +0200, Marc escribió:
Work fine.

Closing the issue, this has been fixed in glx-diversions (and hopefully it won't rereappear).

Happy hacking,
--
"Some people worry that artificial intelligence will make us feel inferior,
but then, anybody in his right mind should have an inferiority complex every
time he looks at a flower."
-- Alan Kay
Saludos /\/\ /\ >< `/

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


--- End Message ---

Reply to: