[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#852690: sddm: Mounts all user home directories, fails to start



Package: sddm
Version: 0.13.0-1
Severity: important

On startup sddm mounts all home directories for our > 4000 accounts.
I suspect that this is due to the display of face icons by default
(which is also rather pointless for many user systems btw.)

I tried different themes (breeze, circles, maledives) without success.
According to https://wiki.ubuntuusers.de/SDDM/ the latter two may work 
without face browsing by default?

The config option 'EnableAvatars' only seems to exist for 0.14.

Cheers,
	Christiopher

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 9.0
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (500, 'testing')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: i386

Kernel: Linux 4.9.0-1-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=de_DE.ISO-8859-1, LC_CTYPE=de_DE.ISO-8859-1 (charmap=ISO-8859-1)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)

Versions of packages sddm depends on:
ii  adduser                           3.115
ii  debconf [debconf-2.0]             1.5.59
ii  libc6                             2.24-8
ii  libgcc1                           1:6.2.1-5
ii  libpam0g                          1.1.8-3.5
ii  libqt5core5a                      5.7.1+dfsg-3
ii  libqt5dbus5                       5.7.1+dfsg-3
ii  libqt5gui5                        5.7.1+dfsg-3
ii  libqt5network5                    5.7.1+dfsg-3
ii  libqt5qml5                        5.7.1-2
ii  libqt5quick5                      5.7.1-2
ii  libstdc++6                        6.2.1-5
ii  libsystemd0                       232-8
ii  libxcb-xkb1                       1.12-1
ii  libxcb1                           1.12-1
ii  qml-module-qtquick2               5.7.1-2
ii  sddm-theme-circles [sddm-theme]   0.13.0-1
ii  sddm-theme-maldives [sddm-theme]  0.13.0-1

Versions of packages sddm recommends:
ii  libpam-systemd  232-8

Versions of packages sddm suggests:
ii  libpam-kwallet5  5.8.4-1

-- debconf-show failed


Reply to: