[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Bug#846410: (no subject)



On martes, 13 de diciembre de 2016 21:00:17 ART Kevin Funk wrote:
> KDevelop maintainer here.
> 
> You can build KDevelop against anything >= 3.6 just fine. It's recommended
> to use the latest possible version. Thus 3.9 will work just fine.
> 
> Regarding the issue with llvmpipe: That's indeed super unfortunate, but I
> don't see an easy solution out of it. The only possibility to have two
> versions of LLVM runtimes loaded:
> 
> a) enable symbol versioning on the Clang/LLVM side, or
> b) link against static version of libclang/LLVM to import all
>    Clang/LLVM symbols into the KDevelop Clang plugin.
> c) use libclang in a separate non-GUI process
>    (requires a whole overhaul of the integration in KDevelop though...)

We should try to get (a). (b) is a non-go in Debian, and (c) is really up to 
you upstreams, with all the required effort it might mean.

*Thanks* for staying in the loop.


-- 
No subestimes el ancho de banda de un camión
cargado de cintas.
  Andrew S. Tanenbaum

Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer
http://perezmeyer.com.ar/
http://perezmeyer.blogspot.com/

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.


Reply to: