Bug#841527: reportbug-ng: Missing installed packages versions in the reports
Package: reportbug-ng
Version: 2.1
Severity: important
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512
Hi,
The reported bugs we are receiving that were generated with reportbug-ng are
missing the installed packages versions.
For example, see: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=841451
This reduces the usefulness of the reports considerably for us.
Happy hacking,
- -- System Information:
Debian Release: stretch/sid
APT prefers unstable-debug
APT policy: (500, 'unstable-debug'), (500, 'buildd-unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (500, 'stable'), (50, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: i386, armhf
Kernel: Linux 4.6.0-1-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_GB.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)
Versions of packages reportbug-ng depends on:
ii python-apt 1.1.0~beta5
ii python-debianbts 2.6.1
ii python-pyqt5 5.7+dfsg-2
ii python-pyqt5.qtwebkit 5.7+dfsg-2
pn python:any <none>
ii xdg-utils 1.1.1-1
ii xterm 325-1
reportbug-ng recommends no packages.
reportbug-ng suggests no packages.
- -- no debconf information
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----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=qLrL
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: