[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#840243: calligra-gemini does not launch due to missing QtQuick components



Package: calligra-gemini
Version: 1:2.9.11+dfsg-2
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable

Dear Maintainer,

calligra-gemini will not launch due to the following error:

"The Calligra Qt Quick components were not found. This means your installation
is broken."

On the console, the following error message is printed:

file:///usr/share/kde4/apps/calligragemini/calligragemini.qml:22:1: module
"org.calligra.CalligraComponents" is not installed
     import org.calligra.CalligraComponents 0.1 as Calligra

It does not matter if calligra-gemini is installed separately or as part of the
whole calligra suite.

Please make sure these componentes are part of calligra-libs or whichever
package they belong.

Thank you!



-- System Information:
Debian Release: stretch/sid
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (300, 'unstable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: i386

Kernel: Linux 4.6.0-1-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_GB.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) (ignored: LC_ALL set to en_GB.UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)

Versions of packages calligra-gemini depends on:
ii  calligra-gemini-data  1:2.9.11+dfsg-2
ii  calligra-libs         1:2.9.11+dfsg-2
ii  calligrastage         1:2.9.11+dfsg-2
ii  calligrawords         1:2.9.11+dfsg-2
ii  kde-runtime           4:16.08.0-1
ii  libc6                 2.24-3
ii  libkdecore5           4:4.14.23-1
ii  libkdeui5             4:4.14.23-1
ii  libqt4-declarative    4:4.8.7+dfsg-9
ii  libqt4-network        4:4.8.7+dfsg-9
ii  libqt4-opengl         4:4.8.7+dfsg-9
ii  libqt4-svg            4:4.8.7+dfsg-9
ii  libqtcore4            4:4.8.7+dfsg-9
ii  libqtgui4             4:4.8.7+dfsg-9
ii  libstdc++6            6.1.1-11

calligra-gemini recommends no packages.

calligra-gemini suggests no packages.

-- no debconf information


Reply to: