severity 816250 wishlist
tag 816250 wontfix
thanks
On Monday 29 February 2016 07:51:35 Hendrik Sattler wrote:
[snip]
> Although not very welcome in the past, it was at least possibly to use
> classes from Qt4 Multimedia module in Debian when using QtMobility
> MultmediaKit. The latter was removed from Debian and the former was not
> built because the latter was in Debian. This obviously changed, so the
> reasoning for not building Qt4 Multimedia module is not valid anymore.
The mobility stack was removed because it was buggy and had a handful of
rdeps, which we've got to remove. If it had just a few rdeps then it's not
that needed, and the same could be said for the multimedia stack.
Qt4 is dead upstream in all senses. So a non upstream-supported stack is
indeed a very good reason to avoid reintroducing it to the archive.
> And no, not everyone ported to Qt5, yet. :-)
This sounds like a good reason to start with the porting :)
Sorry, but if you really need the multimedia bits you should really consider
using Qt5.
Kinds regards, Lisandro.
--
16: De quien es Internet
* De DIOS dado que todas las cosas del mundo le pertenecen
Damian Nadales
http://mx.grulic.org.ar/lurker/message/20080307.141449.a70fb2fc.es.html
Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer
http://perezmeyer.com.ar/
http://perezmeyer.blogspot.com/
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.