Bug#816260: cantor: Please re-enable the scilab backend
Package: cantor
Version: 4:15.12.2-1
Severity: normal
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512
Hi,
The latest version of cantor uploaded to unstable disables the scilab backend
due to #749833 and the request from the release team to avoid blocking serious
bugs with the meta-kde packages (meta-kde depends on cantor, so the removal
from testing of scilab would, at least, leave some uninstallable pacakges that
meta-kde depends upon).
I'm adding this bug a as reminder to re-enable the backend once the bug in
scilab is fixed.
Happy hacking,
- -- System Information:
Debian Release: stretch/sid
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (500, 'testing'), (500, 'stable'), (50, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: i386, armhf
Kernel: Linux 4.3.0-1-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_GB.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)
Versions of packages cantor depends on:
ii kde-runtime 4:15.08.3-1+b1
ii libc6 2.21-9
ii libkdecore5 4:4.14.14-1+b1
ii libkdeui5 4:4.14.14-1+b1
ii libkio5 4:4.14.14-1+b1
ii libknewstuff3-4 4:4.14.14-1+b1
ii libkparts4 4:4.14.14-1+b1
ii libktexteditor4 4:4.14.14-1+b1
ii libqt4-xml 4:4.8.7+dfsg-6
ii libqt4-xmlpatterns 4:4.8.7+dfsg-6
ii libqtcore4 4:4.8.7+dfsg-6
ii libqtgui4 4:4.8.7+dfsg-6
ii libspectre1 0.2.7-3
ii libstdc++6 5.3.1-8
Versions of packages cantor recommends:
pn cantor-backend-kalgebra <none>
ii texlive-binaries 2015.20150524.37493-7+b1
ii texlive-latex-base 2015.20160215-1
Versions of packages cantor suggests:
pn cantor-backend-maxima <none>
pn cantor-backend-octave <none>
pn cantor-backend-python2 <none>
pn cantor-backend-qalculate <none>
pn cantor-backend-r <none>
pn cantor-backend-sage <none>
pn cantor-backend-scilab <none>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2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=G+7L
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: