On mar., 2015-03-03 at 03:59 +0000, Mike Gabriel wrote: > I am quite positive that some missing gettys because of two DMs being > installed in parallel (or some similar normal thing that people might > do) will definitely be worth a freeze exception. > > IMHO, if gettys don't come up properly, the system is rather broken > and this is a no-go for jessie. Sure, but I had the impression that this wasn't the case for lightdm (and slim), according to Simon initial email. And I can confirm plymouth+lightdm seems to work just fine with init=systemd here. Regards, -- Yves-Alexis
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part