Bug#735261: mutiple upstream bugs
On Sun, Jan 18, 2015 at 5:44 PM, Shai Berger wrote:
> I am asking about "serious" vs. "non-serious" because those are the terms used
> by reportbug ("non-serious data loss" is a reason to mark a bug "grave").
Both grave and critical refer to actual data loss. Using the term
serious isn't particularly useful since that falls outside those two
categories anyway.
> Calling data-loss which you find unimportant "perceived, not actual" isn't
> helpful at all. You're playing with terms rather than making points.
If it were unimportant, then the bts would have the bug at less than
important severity.
The description of the "important" may help correct the ongoing misperception:
https://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#severities
Best wishes,
Mike
Reply to: