Bug#735261: mutiple upstream bugs
On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 8:07 AM, Shai Berger wrote:
> On Friday 16 January 2015 01:45:53 Michael Gilbert wrote:
>> > However, the problem reported here is not a usability problem. If a mail
>> > client losing record of which mails have been read and which haven't
>> > isn't "non-serious data loss", I can't tell what is.
>>
>> Actual data loss.
>>
>
> So, the bits marking messages as "read" or "unread" are not data? What, pray
> tell, are they?
Easily recreatable bit flags.
Best wishes,
Mike
Reply to: