Having digikam 5 also brings digikam back and his a step in the right direction. So your argument is rather void.>What's the benefice of taking this path? Developpers are now focussed >on >digikam 5 and the beta2 is already working fine. > >Anyway I do not care as I now have digikam 5.0.0-beta2 working on my >system... It would get a working Digikam back, which I think is a great idea. -- eric |