Re: Comments regarding libaccounts-glib_1.18+20150112-1_amd64.changes
Where you have them installed is very Python specific. I'm not an expert on pygi, I may be wrong, but I think the Python depends should be there.
Scott K
On September 11, 2015 9:53:30 PM EDT, Diane Trout <diane@debian.org> wrote:
>
>Hm. I see the python file, but I thought gir1.2-* packages were a type
>library
>that provided services to multiple dynamic languages?
>
>The gi/overrides suggests they have a mechanism to override part of the
>api
>generated dynamically.
>
>apt-file search gi/override returns a few gir1.2 packages that have a
>.py file
>and only one lists a depends on python.
>
>gir1.2-dee-1.0:
>gir1.2-gexiv2-0.10
>gir1.2-grip
>gir1.2-ibus-1.0
>
>Diane
>
>On Saturday, September 12, 2015 00:16:10 Scott Kitterman wrote:
>> As is in this package, gir1.2-accounts-1.0 can't possibly work
>without a
>> python (or python3) interpreter installed, but it depends on neither.
> I am
>> going to go ahead and accept the package, but I think this should be
>fixed
>> right away.
>>
>> The usual way to generate correct python depends is with
>${python:Depends}
>> or ${python3:Depends} and dh_python2 or dh_python3.
Reply to: