[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#563832: marked as done (QProcess: when starting a non-existent application, a zombie process appears)



Your message dated Mon, 31 Aug 2015 21:05:29 -0300
with message-id <1857245.T9zQqJLVcE@luna>
and subject line Done
has caused the Debian Bug report #563832,
regarding QProcess: when starting a non-existent application, a zombie process appears
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
563832: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=563832
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: partitionmanager
Version: 1.0.0-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable


Upon starting partitionmanager, it asks for root password, but then the window doesn't appear, and you can see in System Activity how several zombie "partitionmanager" processes appear. There is one which is not zombie, if you kill it, all of them disappear.
It seems like the program starts OK if you execute partitionmanager-bin, and it offers the option of not using root privileges, and therefore hard drives do not appear listed, etc.

Maybe it's a bug in kdesu or something, not really partitionmanager fault...

I have my own debian-liveCD made with live-helper, and same thing happens, but there's no root password there, of course.
If I set one up, same problems occur.s



-- System Information:
Debian Release: squeeze/sid
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (500, 'testing')
Architecture: i386 (i686)

Kernel: Linux 2.6.26-2-686 (SMP w/1 CPU core)
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash

Versions of packages partitionmanager depends on:
ii  kdebase-runtime   4:4.3.2-1              runtime components from the offici
ii  kdelibs5          4:4.3.2-2              core libraries for all KDE 4 appli
ii  libblkid1         2.16.2-0               block device id library
ii  libc6             2.10.2-2               GNU C Library: Shared libraries
ii  libgcc1           1:4.4.2-3              GCC support library
ii  libparted1.8-12   1.8.8.git.2009.07.19-5 The GNU Parted disk partitioning s
ii  libqtcore4        4:4.5.3-4              Qt 4 core module
ii  libqtgui4         4:4.5.3-4              Qt 4 GUI module
ii  libstdc++6        4.4.2-3                The GNU Standard C++ Library v3
ii  libuuid1          2.16.2-0               Universally Unique ID library

partitionmanager recommends no packages.

Versions of packages partitionmanager suggests:
ii  dosfstools                    3.0.6-1    utilities for making and checking 
pn  hfsplus                       <none>     (no description available)
pn  hfsutils                      <none>     (no description available)
pn  jfsutils                      <none>     (no description available)
ii  ntfsprogs                     2.0.0-1+b1 tools for doing neat things in NTF
pn  reiser4progs                  <none>     (no description available)
pn  reiserfsprogs                 <none>     (no description available)
ii  udev                          149-1      /dev/ and hotplug management daemo
pn  xfsprogs                      <none>     (no description available)

-- no debconf information



--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 4:4.8.7+dfsg-1

According to upstream it's believed to be fixed at some point. As I don't know 
the correct version I'm closing it with the version in testing which is the 
last official Qt4 release.

-- 

Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer
http://perezmeyer.com.ar/
http://perezmeyer.blogspot.com/

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.


--- End Message ---

Reply to: