[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#793026: kde-window-manager: upgrade to 4:5.3.2-2 generates



On Tue, 04 Aug 2015 13:30:22 -0300 Lisandro =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Dami=E1n_Nicanor_P=E9rez?= Meyer <perezmeyer@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tuesday 04 August 2015 16:25:03 Pedram Pourang wrote:
> [snip]
> > Why uploading a buggy KDE to Testing? Why not just keeping them in Unstable > > until a reliable version comes out? Dear maintainers, PLEASE DO USE WHAT YOU
> > MAINTAIN! At least for a few days!
>
> Pedram, I find that offensive. We do use Plasma5, we know it has glitches, we
> know it's the only way forward to prepare the next stable release.
>
> If you really want something more stable, please, use Debian stable.

Hi,

I'm Pedram (Tsu). Please don't be offended by a rational and POLITE criticism! Otherwise you would make any criticism impossible.


I use Debian Testing (with some packages from Unstable) for more that 6 years. It has been stable, secure and fairly up-to-date. Those, who want to maintain/test/have new software, go to Unstable and those, who don't want frequent updates or want to run a server, go to Stable. In short, Debian Testing has never been for testing NEW SOFTWARE but for testing already tested software against the strict Debian standards for Stable.


As for maintainers that don't use Debian (NOT all maintainers, of course), I've seen signs of that but will be really glad if I'm wrong.

I ask again: If you knew that KF5 wasn't ready for use (and I could write several lines why it isn't), why did you uploaded it from Unstable to Testing? This is a rational question, not a means to offend anyone. You don't have to answer it if that was just a mistake because mistakes happen. I'm just worried about their becoming more that exceptions.


Reply to: